<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tetra / Airwave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lessradiation.co.uk/tetra-airwave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lessradiation.co.uk</link>
	<description>Sick of Pulsed Non-Ionising Radiation? So are we...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:32:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lessradiation.co.uk/tetra-airwave/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lessradiation.co.uk/?page_id=6#comment-427</guid>
		<description>The screenshot of your counter is wrong. Tetra frequencies for the police are from 380-385 MHz and 390-395 MHz

Therefore your article is a little misleading to say the least.

Also the equipment you have used for measured field strength would not give a very true reading. A receiver such an R&amp;S EB-200 Miniport with a calibrated antenna would give you a true reading.

----------------

LessRadiation replies: Greetings to you in Gibraltar Steve. Your points are quite valid. If i&#039;d used the equipment you suggest I&#039;d have recorded an even stronger signal level at exactly the right frequency! Surely you&#039;re not suggesting I was picking up GSM... There are photos of the Tetra mast in question on this site. It&#039;s transmitting at 4 times the power of the GSM mast &amp; both are the same distance from my house. A crappy £10 bug detector with LEDs on it that can only detect a proper FM bug at 2 metres can detect the Tetra mast at 500 metres. I think my DigiScout was seeing the Tetra mast, don&#039;t you? Shame you disagree - maybe you&#039;re stupid?  

PS I just looked up the EB-200 Miniport and it looks a bit out of my budget! I bet you don&#039;t have one in your shack do you. That DigiScout cost me £500 and has been worth every penny... I&#039;m sure you&#039;re not stupid really, just pedantic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The screenshot of your counter is wrong. Tetra frequencies for the police are from 380-385 MHz and 390-395 MHz</p>
<p>Therefore your article is a little misleading to say the least.</p>
<p>Also the equipment you have used for measured field strength would not give a very true reading. A receiver such an R&amp;S EB-200 Miniport with a calibrated antenna would give you a true reading.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>LessRadiation replies: Greetings to you in Gibraltar Steve. Your points are quite valid. If i&#8217;d used the equipment you suggest I&#8217;d have recorded an even stronger signal level at exactly the right frequency! Surely you&#8217;re not suggesting I was picking up GSM&#8230; There are photos of the Tetra mast in question on this site. It&#8217;s transmitting at 4 times the power of the GSM mast &#038; both are the same distance from my house. A crappy £10 bug detector with LEDs on it that can only detect a proper FM bug at 2 metres can detect the Tetra mast at 500 metres. I think my DigiScout was seeing the Tetra mast, don&#8217;t you? Shame you disagree &#8211; maybe you&#8217;re stupid?  </p>
<p>PS I just looked up the EB-200 Miniport and it looks a bit out of my budget! I bet you don&#8217;t have one in your shack do you. That DigiScout cost me £500 and has been worth every penny&#8230; I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re not stupid really, just pedantic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
